On these Lots, and can be applied to the water frontage as they do not even have frontage - that I do not therefore see how they could have expected to have received notice of the proposed resumption. It never was meant to be kept secret. And if the Trustees are in treaty for sale of the property they might naturally have been better informed from Quarter Master General's office.
Colonel Lovell, 10 November 1866, says "except the small plot happily expected to communicate on the subject with the Military Authorities, and could have done so immediately on receipt of the notice." Colonel Lovell states that "the War Department and Navy own the whole of the water frontage from the East Praya to the Barrack Wharf." This is certainly not the case as to Lots 20 and 21, because his...
on there Lots, and can -right-to the
have no
water frontage as they
do wot even pent
frontage -
that-
I do not therefore see how they could have expected to have received
nolice of the proposed resumption-
It never was
meant to be kept secret,
And
سنا
if
the Frustees are
in treaty for tale of the
foroperly they might- naturally have been
Cobedovell. 10 Vecmber
better from
Quater Master ferme to los set. 19.
1866-
"except ther smale plote haply
372 expected to communicate
on the pubject-orith the
Military Authorities, and
Could have done to im-
mediately on receipt-
of the notice
Colonel Lovell plates
that "the War Department
and Navy
ow
or
pent- the whole of
the water frontage from the East- Praya to the Barrack Whank This is certainly
not-
the care as to Loti 20
And 21- because his
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.